diff --git a/adoptions/paper.pdf b/adoptions/paper.pdf
index 84b1acc522020a07015aac1ed001dccbf21f5dfe..2c656c324d72787bed53425da7e329c3ff83757b 100644
Binary files a/adoptions/paper.pdf and b/adoptions/paper.pdf differ
diff --git a/adoptions/phenomena.tex b/adoptions/phenomena.tex
index fe87a89f44281dc603c8a23488483d0f53aa5e7f..694a9430a82103fa2a97e0ba8bc3240e81d55820 100644
--- a/adoptions/phenomena.tex
+++ b/adoptions/phenomena.tex
@@ -96,22 +96,20 @@ definitions and theorems. For instance, when establishing results, \cite{covers-
 In the second example, the situation is a bit more complex, since the import of the
 terminology and definitions is not direct, but involves a choice.
 
-\begin{example}\label{ex:mnets}
-  \cite{mnets-orig} studies the properties of multinets. In the preliminaries section they
-  are introduced with the following definition:
-  \begin{labeledquote}\sf
-    \textbf{Definition 2.1} The union of all completely reducible fibers (with a fixed
-    partition into fibers, also called blocks) of a Ceva pencil of degree $d$ is called a
-    $(k, d)-\mathit{multinet}$ where $k$ is the number of the blocks. The base $X$ of the
-    pencil is determined by the multinet structure and called the base of the multinet.
-  \end{labeledquote}
-  Later in that section some properties of multinets are introduced with the phrase
-  ``\textsf{Several important properties of multinets are listed below which have been
-    collected from [4,10,12].}''. The referenced papers all use slightly different
-  definitions of multinets but they are assumed to be equivalent so that the properties
-  hold. In fact, in this paper (\cite{mnets-orig}) the assumption is made explicit --
-  although not proved -- from the start: ``\textsf{There are several equivalent ways to
-    define multinets. Here we present them using pencils of plane curves.}''
+\begin{example}\label{ex:mnets} \cite{mnets-orig} studies the properties of multinets. In
+the preliminaries section they are introduced with the following definition:
+  \begin{labeledquote}\sf \textbf{Definition 2.1} The union of all completely reducible
+fibers (with a fixed partition into fibers, also called blocks) of a Ceva pencil of degree
+$d$ is called a $(k, d)-\mathit{multinet}$ where $k$ is the number of the blocks. The base
+$X$ of the pencil is determined by the multinet structure and called the base of the
+multinet.
+  \end{labeledquote} Later in that section some properties of multinets are introduced
+with the phrase ``\textsf{Several important properties of multinets are listed below which
+have been collected from [4,10,12].}''. The referenced papers all use slightly different
+definitions of multinets but they are assumed to be equivalent so that the properties
+hold. In fact, in this paper (\cite{mnets-orig}) the assumption is made explicit --
+although not proved -- from the start: ``\textsf{There are several equivalent ways to
+define multinets. Here we present them using pencils of plane curves.}''
 \end{example}
 
 The next example is not from our 30 examples, since we want to show an even more complex
diff --git a/flatsearch/paper.pdf b/flatsearch/paper.pdf
index 3a336eb5f4f021d1b16b686aac740c55070fc25d..065f027714aa8bfa62ab6e4d35d426800386a742 100644
Binary files a/flatsearch/paper.pdf and b/flatsearch/paper.pdf differ