adapting title/abstract

tex/paper.tex

@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
 
 \pagestyle{plain} % remove for final version
 
-\author{Dennis Müller\inst{1} \and Florian Rabe\inst{1,2} \and Michael Kohlhase\inst{1}}
+\author{Dennis Müller\inst{1} \and Michael Kohlhase\inst{1}\and Florian Rabe\inst{1,2}}
 \institute{Computer Science, FAU Erlangen-N\"urnberg\and LRI, Universit\'e Paris Sud}
 
 \begin{document}
@@ -66,18 +66,23 @@
 %\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
 
 
-\title{Alignment Finding}
+\title{Automatically Finding Theory Morphisms for Knowledge Management}
 \maketitle
 \begin{abstract}
-We present a method for finding morphisms between formal theories, both within as well as across libraries based
-on different logical foundations. These morphisms can yield both (more or less formal) \emph{alignments} between
-individual symbols as well as truth-preserving morphisms between whole theories. 
-
-In particular, we focus on an application of \emph{theory discovery},
-where a user can check whether a (part of a) formal theory already exists in some library, potentially avoiding duplication
-of work or suggesting an opportunity for refactoring.
-
-Furthermore, we present an implementation of both the algorithm as well as the specific use case in the MMT system.
+  We present a method for finding morphisms between formal theories, both within as well
+  as across libraries based on different logical foundations. These morphisms can yield
+  both (more or less formal) \emph{alignments} between individual symbols as well as
+  truth-preserving morphisms between whole theories. As they induce new theorems in the
+  target theory for any of the source theory, theory morphisms are high-value elements of
+  a modular formal library. Usually, theory morphisms are manually encoded, but this
+  practice requires authors who are familiar with source and target theories at the same
+  time, which limits the scalability of the manual approach. 
+
+  To remedy this problem, we have developed a view-finder algorithm that automates theory
+  morphism discovery. In this paper we present and implementation in the MMT system and
+  show specific use cases. We focus on an application of \emph{theory discovery}, where a user can
+  check whether a (part of a) formal theory already exists in some library, potentially
+  avoiding duplication of work or suggesting an opportunity for refactoring.
 \end{abstract}
 
 \setcounter{tocdepth}{2}\tableofcontents\newpage
@@ -113,4 +118,5 @@ Open Archive for Formalizations (KO 2428/13-1).
 %  LocalWords:  ifshort sec:relwork relwork renewcommand bibfont tbw setcounter tocdepth
 %  LocalWords:  tableofcontents defemph compactenum emptyset newpart compactitem lstset
 %  LocalWords:  centering aboveskip 0pt,belowskip hline lstlisting mathescape rightarrow
-%  LocalWords:  vdash baseset sec:concl subsubsection Formalizations
+%  LocalWords:  vdash baseset sec:concl subsubsection Formalizations emph sec:usecase
+%  LocalWords:  usecase