Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
report.tex 3.23 KiB
Newer Older
  • Learn to ignore specific revisions
  • \documentclass[a4paper]{scrartcl}
    
    \usepackage[backend=biber]{biblatex}
    \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
    \usepackage{amsmath}
    \usepackage{geometry}
    \usepackage{hyperref}
    \usepackage{lipsum}
    \usepackage{multicol}
    
    \addbibresource{references.bib}
    \geometry{a4paper, portrait}
    \pagenumbering{gobble}
    
    \title{ulo-storage}
    \subtitle{Indexing and Querying Organizational Data in Mathematical Libraries}
    \author{Andreas Schärtl (\texttt{ru64tiji})}
    \date{\vspace{-1cm}}
    
    \begin{document}
    
    % [Title]
    \maketitle{}
    
    % [Abstract]
    \begin{abstract}
    \lipsum[1]
    \end{abstract}
    
    \section{Crystal Palace}
    
    Then --- this is all what you say --- new economic relations will be
    established, all ready-made and worked out with mathematical
    exactitude, so that every possible question will vanish in the
    twinkling of an eye, simply because every possible answer to it will be
    provided.  Then the "Palace of Crystal" will be built.  Then ...  In
    fact, those will be halcyon days.  Of course there is no guaranteeing
    (this is my comment) that it will not be, for instance, frightfully
    dull then (for what will one have to do when everything will be
    calculated and tabulated), but on the other hand everything will be
    extraordinarily rational.  Of course boredom may lead you to anything.
    It is boredom sets one sticking golden pins into people, but all that
    would not matter.  What is bad (this is my comment again) is that I
    dare say people will be thankful for the gold pins then.  Man is
    stupid, you know, phenomenally stupid; or rather he is not at all
    stupid, but he is so ungrateful that you could not find another like
    him in all creation.  I, for instance, would not be in the least
    surprised if all of a sudden, A PROPOS of nothing, in the midst of
    general prosperity a gentleman with an ignoble, or rather with a
    reactionary and ironical, countenance were to arise and, putting his
    arms akimbo, say to us all: "I say, gentleman, hadn't we better kick
    over the whole show and scatter rationalism to the winds, simply to
    send these logarithms to the devil, and to enable us to live once more
    at our own sweet foolish will!" That again would not matter, but what
    is annoying is that he would be sure to find followers --- such is the
    nature of man.  And all that for the most foolish reason, which, one
    would think, was hardly worth mentioning: that is, that man everywhere
    and at all times, whoever he may be, has preferred to act as he chose
    and not in the least as his reason and advantage dictated.  And one may
    choose what is contrary to one's own interests, and sometimes one
    POSITIVELY OUGHT (that is my idea).  One's own free unfettered choice,
    one's own caprice, however wild it may be, one's own fancy worked up at
    times to frenzy --- is that very "most advantageous advantage" which we
    have overlooked, which comes under no classification and against which
    all systems and theories are continually being shattered to atoms.
    
    \section{Choice}
    
    And how do these wiseacres know that man wants a normal, a virtuous
    choice?  What has made them conceive that man must want a rationally
    advantageous choice?  What man wants is simply INDEPENDENT choice,
    whatever that independence may cost and wherever it may lead.  And
    choice, of course, the devil only knows what choice~\cite{wikibook}.
    
    \printbibliography{}
    
    \end{document}