Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
S
schaertl_andreas
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
supervision
schaertl_andreas
Commits
451c51df
Commit
451c51df
authored
4 years ago
by
Andreas Schärtl
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
4.0
parent
a37f0733
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
doc/report/applications.tex
+11
-8
11 additions, 8 deletions
doc/report/applications.tex
with
11 additions
and
8 deletions
doc/report/applications.tex
+
11
−
8
View file @
451c51df
...
...
@@ -5,11 +5,16 @@ both Isabelle and Coq exports stored in {GraphDB}. We experimented with
various queries and applications:
\begin{itemize}
\item
Exploring which ULO predicates are actually used and which
remain unused (Section~
\ref
{
sec:expl
}
).
\item
Exploring which ULO predicates are actually used in the
existing Coq and Isabelle exports. We find that more than two
thirds of existing ULO predicates were not taken advantage of
(Section~
\ref
{
sec:expl
}
).
\item
We ran some queries that were suggested as building blocks
of a larger tetrapodal search system (Section~
\ref
{
sec:tetraq
}
).
\item
We investigated queries that could be used to extend the
system into a larger tetrapodal search system. While some
organizational queries have obvious canonical solutions others
introduce questions on how organizational knowledge should be
organized (Section~
\ref
{
sec:tetraq
}
).
\item
We also experimented with various other more general queries
for organizational data recommended in literature
...
...
@@ -19,9 +24,7 @@ various queries and applications:
the ULO data set (Section~
\ref
{
sec:webq
}
).
\end{itemize}
For each example query or application, we try to describe how to
implement it, what results we observed and if possible we conclude
with some recommendations for future development of
{
ULO
}
.
\noindent
Each application will now be discussed in a dedicated section.
\subsection
{
Exploring Existing Data Sets
}
\label
{
sec:expl
}
...
...
@@ -267,7 +270,7 @@ idea to design a dedicated ontology and potentially data store entirely.
Finally, while we were able to formulate a SPARQL query that should
take care of most of~
$
\mathcal
{
Q
}_
3
$
we found that the existing data sets
contain very little information about authorship. This underlines
the observations made in Section~
\
label
{
sec:expl
}
, developers writing
the observations made in Section~
\
ref
{
sec:expl
}
, developers writing
applications that query ULO storage need to be aware of the fact that
existing exports have ``holes''.
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment