Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
S
schaertl_andreas
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Container Registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Terms and privacy
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
supervision
schaertl_andreas
Commits
cd3050c4
Commit
cd3050c4
authored
4 years ago
by
Andreas Schärtl
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
doc: add component description
parent
afbb8296
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
3
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
3 changed files
README.md
+4
-2
4 additions, 2 deletions
README.md
doc/components.md
+57
-0
57 additions, 0 deletions
doc/components.md
doc/components.png
+0
-0
0 additions, 0 deletions
doc/components.png
with
61 additions
and
2 deletions
README.md
+
4
−
2
View file @
cd3050c4
Directories
===========
*
`/
timeline`
: Goals and results for each week
.
*
`/
doc`
: Project documentation
.
*
`/
ulo`
: Playing around w/ the results of the ULO paper [1, 2]
*
`/
timeline`
: Goals and results for each week.
*
`/graphdb`
: Playing with the RDF4J [3] API of GraphDB [4].
*
`/ulo`
: Playing around w/ the results of the ULO paper [1, 2]
References
==========
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
doc/components.md
0 → 100644
+
57
−
0
View file @
cd3050c4
Components
==========
This is a rough sketch of the involved components of this project.
Look at
`componets.png`
for a little illustration of the involved
components.
`Collector`
-----------
*
Given some source of ULO/RDF files (Git repository, HTTP server,
local file system), the
`Collector`
processes/cleans up these files
and forwards them to the
`Importer`
.
*
Implement core functionality as library with command line and web
front end.
*
Can be implemented in any language. I'll probably pick Go as I'm
pretty productive in it.
`Harvester`
-----------
*
Low Priority. Just an idea I had. But it might go against the idea
of using MathHub as a centralized place for data.
*
Converts arbitrary source data (e.g. Coq) to ULO/RDF.
*
The generated RDF is
*volatile*
, it does not need to be stored to
any repository. Rather it is directly forwarded to a
`Collector`
.
*
I'm not sure if this makes any sense actually as it might be
difficult to track changes and so on.
*
Can be implemented in any language that makes sense for the given
source format.
`Importer`
----------
*
Essentially a wrapper around a database. Written in the language
that best fits the database. In particular, GraphDB only has good
Java/JVM programming support.
*
Accessed w/ a simple file upload API. You upload a file and get a
path returned that shows you the current state of the import.
`Endpoint`
----------
*
Again, like the
`Importer`
, this is a wrapper around the database.
*
Might be optional if applications accesses the database directly.
Certainly when it comes to querying I will not introduce a custom API
as querying is a problem way way more complicated than a simple
import.
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
doc/components.png
0 → 100644
+
0
−
0
View file @
cd3050c4
726 KiB
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment