bla

adoptions/phenomena.tex

@@ -96,18 +96,16 @@ definitions and theorems. For instance, when establishing results, \cite{covers-
 In the second example, the situation is a bit more complex, since the import of the
 terminology and definitions is not direct, but involves a choice.
 
-\begin{example}\label{ex:mnets}
-  \cite{mnets-orig} studies the properties of multinets. In the preliminaries section they
-  are introduced with the following definition:
-  \begin{labeledquote}\sf
-    \textbf{Definition 2.1} The union of all completely reducible fibers (with a fixed
-    partition into fibers, also called blocks) of a Ceva pencil of degree $d$ is called a
-    $(k, d)-\mathit{multinet}$ where $k$ is the number of the blocks. The base $X$ of the
-    pencil is determined by the multinet structure and called the base of the multinet.
-  \end{labeledquote}
-  Later in that section some properties of multinets are introduced with the phrase
-  ``\textsf{Several important properties of multinets are listed below which have been
-    collected from [4,10,12].}''. The referenced papers all use slightly different
+\begin{example}\label{ex:mnets} \cite{mnets-orig} studies the properties of multinets. In
+the preliminaries section they are introduced with the following definition:
+  \begin{labeledquote}\sf \textbf{Definition 2.1} The union of all completely reducible
+fibers (with a fixed partition into fibers, also called blocks) of a Ceva pencil of degree
+$d$ is called a $(k, d)-\mathit{multinet}$ where $k$ is the number of the blocks. The base
+$X$ of the pencil is determined by the multinet structure and called the base of the
+multinet.
+  \end{labeledquote} Later in that section some properties of multinets are introduced
+with the phrase ``\textsf{Several important properties of multinets are listed below which
+have been collected from [4,10,12].}''. The referenced papers all use slightly different
 definitions of multinets but they are assumed to be equivalent so that the properties
 hold. In fact, in this paper (\cite{mnets-orig}) the assumption is made explicit --
 although not proved -- from the start: ``\textsf{There are several equivalent ways to